The challenge in this election is that we have too many people on the ballot who would be great ambassadors for FAN, so there will be no losers, just those who are asked to wait their turn, & be great ambassadors for FAN in the interim.
I would ask that an early Board action be to consider slowly expanding the Board beyond the startup level of 7 dictated in the bylaws, but continue to have competitive elections.
The nice thing about being limited to 7 is it makes us think about what we consider most important, at this point. For me it is certain skills + experience + demonstrated commitment. Here is my voting criteria of groups I want represented, everyone’s will be different, & mine may change if I hear from others.
(1) Founders - all this in less than a year!!! You have got to be kidding me…
(2) CodeNEXT experts - a once in a generation chance to help positively shape policy.
(3) Leaders of Member NA’s - the design point says it moves up higher as we mature, then
(4) Geographic Representation (will be achieved)
(5) Renters - 56% of Austin, trying to have at least one should be higher on the list!
(6) Age distribution would be nice (20’s, 30’s…60’s), M/F, as well as ethnicity.
(7) Historic supporters - need to appreciate that perspective & find common ground.
None of this is “token”, but to try & make sure various voices are represented.
As the election ends October 7th @ 9:00 a.m.,and is subject to revision until that time, protocol would say we are in the early voting period, and the nominees still have time to “campaign”.
Related to (2), as CodeNEXT is so important to the mission, I would ask that Frank Harren & Meghan Elizabeth, who both appear to have either excellent experience &/or training applicable to that area discuss same, and how they would work together if only one can be fit on the board at this time.
Pete - related to (1) & (3) can you clarify who the founders & leaders of Member NA’s are on the ballot?