Should FAN Allow People in Member NAs to Be At Large Members

@alyshalynn,it might be worth pointing out that if DANA votes, and they do consistently, then X,XXX members are represented by that vote. If FoHP votes, and they do consistently, then XXX members are represented by that vote.

Currently we essentially have the FAN Board acting like the “Executive Branch”, and Assembly of Delegates, acting like the “Senate” - and in that model Rhode Island and California both get the same number of votes. Perhaps something else would be a better fit for FAN, because “at-large” is unique, but as a member of DANA, whose vote is most underrepresented by the Senate system, I’d say I’m okay with that, because if we went to a member count “House or Representatives” model then start-up member NA’s would never have a voice.